Protons, Planck Scale, Infinite Now
Bridging the Cosmic and Quantum Ratios, Discrete Reality, and the Nature of Time and Unity
Introduction: The Grand Inquiry into Scale, Time, and Unity
This report embarks on an interdisciplinary journey, exploring the fascinating connections between the fundamental scales of the universe, the nature of time, and the profound concept of unity. The initial assertion, which posits a remarkable numerical ratio between a proton and the solar system mirroring that between the Planck scale and a proton, serves as a springboard for examining the very fabric of reality. This analysis will delve into the scientific underpinnings of these scales, explore theoretical physics' propositions for a discrete spacetime, and then transition to the deep philosophical and spiritual considerations of time as an "infinite now" and the ultimate interconnectedness implied by "All is One." This exploration aims to synthesize rigorous scientific inquiry with contemplative philosophical thought, seeking a holistic understanding of existence.
1. The Cosmic and Quantum Ratios: Exploring the Scale of Existence
This section meticulously examines the numerical claim presented, grounding it in established scientific measurements and then broadening the discussion to the philosophical implications of such large number observations.
1.1 Defining the Scales: Planck, Proton, and Solar System
To evaluate the proposed ratios, it is essential to establish the accepted scientific dimensions of the entities involved. Planck units represent a system of natural units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of universal physical constants: the speed of light (c), the gravitational constant (G), the reduced Planck constant (ħ), and the Boltzmann constant (kB).1 When expressed in Planck units, these fundamental constants yield a numerical value of 1, which simplifies many equations in theoretical physics.4
Specifically, the Planck length (ℓP) is an extraordinarily small unit, approximately 1.616 × 10^-35 meters.1 This length is considered the smallest possible meaningful distance in physics, as it is the scale at which the structure of spacetime is expected to be dominated by quantum effects.5 Similarly, the Planck time (tP) is approximately 5.391 × 10^-44 seconds, defined as the time it takes for light to travel one Planck length.1 The Planck scale signifies a region where the predictions of the Standard Model, quantum field theory, and general relativity are not expected to apply, and quantum effects of gravity are anticipated to dominate.1
In contrast, the proton is a subatomic particle with a well-measured, albeit slightly varying, dimension. The proton charge radius is approximately 0.841 femtometers (fm), which translates to 0.841 × 10^-15 meters.9 This dimension is significantly larger than the Planck length, by about 20 orders of magnitude.5
For the Solar System, its scale can be defined by the orbit of its outermost widely recognized planet or dwarf planet. Considering Pluto, its average distance from the Sun is approximately 5.9 billion kilometers.11 Therefore, the approximate diameter of the Solar System, encompassing Pluto's orbit, is twice this distance, or 1.18 × 10^10 kilometers, which is equivalent to 1.18 × 10^13 meters.11 This provides a macroscopic scale for comparison.
1.2 Quantitative Analysis of the Proposed Ratios
With the defined scales, a direct quantitative analysis of the proposed ratios can be performed.
The first ratio, between the proton radius and the Solar System diameter, is calculated as:
(0.841 × 10^-15 m) / (1.18 × 10^13 m) ≈ 7.13 × 10^-29
The second ratio, between the Planck length and the proton radius, is calculated as:
(1.616 × 10^-35 m) / (0.841 × 10^-15 m) ≈ 1.92 × 10^-20
Comparing these two calculated values, 7.13 × 10^-29 and 1.92 × 10^-20, it becomes evident that they are numerically distinct. The difference between these two ratios is approximately nine orders of magnitude (10^9). This direct calculation demonstrates that the assertion of these ratios being "the same" is not supported by current scientific measurements.
To provide a clear overview of these scales and their relationships, the following table summarizes the key values and the calculated ratios:
Table 1: Comparative Scale Ratios of the Universe
The table clearly illustrates the immense differences in scale from the quantum realm to the cosmic, highlighting the abstract nature of these concepts and providing an evidence-based foundation for further discussion.
1.4 Deeper Considerations: Cosmic Coincidences and the Large Numbers Hypothesis
While the specific numerical equality initially presented is not precise, the underlying pursuit of profound relationships between vastly different scales is a recurring and compelling theme in physics. This intellectual inclination leads to the concept of "cosmic coincidences" and the Dirac Large Numbers Hypothesis (LNH).12 The human mind naturally seeks patterns and meaning, even in seemingly disparate numerical relationships between fundamental constants or scales.
The LNH, proposed by Paul Dirac in 1937, observes that several very large dimensionless ratios in the universe appear to be approximately equal.13 Examples include the ratio of the electromagnetic force to the gravitational force between elementary particles, or the age of the universe expressed in atomic time units, both of which are roughly 10^40.13 Dirac speculated that these striking numerical similarities might not be mere coincidences but could imply that fundamental constants, such as the gravitational constant (G), might actually vary over cosmological timescales.13 This line of inquiry suggests a dynamic universe where the very parameters governing its behavior are not static.
The existence of these large number observations, even if not exact equalities as in the initial claim, has spurred significant philosophical discussions, particularly regarding the "anthropic coincidence" or the concept of a "fine-tuned universe".12 The argument here is that if these fundamental ratios or constants were significantly different, the conditions necessary for the formation of stars, the synthesis of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, and ultimately the emergence of complex life (especially carbon-based life) might not exist.12 This perspective elevates the discussion from simple numerical observation to a contemplation of the very possibility of our existence, suggesting a profound, albeit debated, connection between the universe's fundamental constants and the emergence of consciousness.
Furthermore, the system of Planck units, often semi-humorously referred to by physicists as "God's units," offers a unique perspective on fundamental physics questions.4 These units are derived solely from intrinsic properties of nature, removing any anthropocentric arbitrariness inherent in human-defined systems like the meter or second.4 This naturalness can reframe how fundamental questions are posed. For instance, as articulated by Frank Wilczek, the question shifts from "Why is gravity so feeble?" to "Why is the proton's mass so small?".1 In Planck units, the strength of gravity is simply a primary quantity, while the proton's mass appears as an incredibly tiny number (approximately 1/13 quintillion).1 This reorientation of perspective can highlight different aspects of the "hierarchy problem" in physics, which concerns the vast disparities between fundamental forces and particle masses.
2. The Fabric of Reality: Discrete Spacetime and the Illusion of Continuous Motion
This section explores scientific theories that support the idea of a fundamentally discrete reality, addressing the analogy of "frames in a movie" and how our perception of continuous motion arises from this underlying structure.
2.1 The Planck Scale as a Fundamental Limit
The Planck length, approximately 1.616 × 10^-35 meters, and Planck time, approximately 5.391 × 10^-44 seconds, represent the scales at which quantum effects of gravity are expected to become dominant.1 At these magnitudes, the established predictions of the Standard Model, quantum field theory, and general relativity are no longer anticipated to apply.1 The Planck scale is widely considered the smallest possible meaningful length and time in physics.5 Any theoretical attempt to probe distances smaller than the Planck length, for instance, by performing extremely high-energy collisions, would inevitably result in the production of black holes, effectively making such measurements impossible.6 This physical limitation strongly suggests a fundamental granularity or "atomicity" to spacetime itself, implying that space and time are not infinitely divisible.
2.2 Theories of Discrete Spacetime
The concept of discrete spacetime is a central tenet in several leading candidates for a quantum theory of gravity.
Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) is one such prominent theory. It postulates that the very structure of space and time is not continuous, as in classical physics, but is instead composed of finite, discrete "loops" woven into an "extremely fine fabric or network" known as spin networks.14 This theoretical framework implies that space itself possesses an "atomic structure," a fundamental, irreducible unit.16 The discreteness in LQG arises from the quantization of geometric operators. In 1994, Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin demonstrated that the quantum operators associated with area and volume possess a discrete spectrum, meaning that geometry itself is quantized.16 This provides a direct physical basis for the idea of spacetime being composed of fundamental "frames." A key feature of LQG is its "background independence," which means the theory's equations are not embedded in, or dependent on, a pre-existing, fixed spacetime.16 Instead, space and time are expected to
emerge from the theory's quantum states at distances larger than the Planck length.16 This represents a radical departure from classical physics, where spacetime is typically viewed as a continuous, fixed arena for physical events.
It is important to contrast LQG with String Theory, another major attempt at a quantum theory of gravity. While both theories aim to unify gravity with quantum mechanics, their fundamental approaches differ. String theory replaces the point-like particles of traditional particle physics with one-dimensional objects called strings, where a graviton (the hypothetical quantum particle carrying the gravitational force) is one of its many vibrational states.18 String theory typically operates on a classically fixed background, although it also addresses phenomena at the Planck scale.5 In contrast, LQG directly quantizes the geometry of spacetime and does not require extra spatial dimensions, unlike many versions of string theory.15
2.3 The Apparent Continuity of Motion: "A Stream of Frames Flying By"
The analogy of "one frame in the movie or episode" where "we perceive the flow as linear motion when it is just a stream of frames flying by extremely fast" aligns remarkably well with the implications of discrete spacetime theories. If spacetime is fundamentally granular, then there would exist an elementary length, sometimes referred to as a "hodon," and a corresponding elementary time, a "chronon".7 A chronon is defined as the time it takes for a photon to travel the distance of one hodon.7 Under this framework, all measurable lengths and times would be integer multiples of these fundamental, indivisible units.7
Our macroscopic perception of continuous motion and smooth spacetime would then be an emergent phenomenon, akin to how a high-resolution digital video appears continuous despite being composed of discrete pixels and frames.16 In LQG, the concept of "weave states" is employed to bridge this gap between the discrete quantum reality and our continuous macroscopic experience.16 A large spin network, composed of numerous Planck-scale nodes and links, would appear as a three-dimensional continuous metric geometry when probed at a macroscopic scale, much like a T-shirt appears smooth from a distance but is made of discrete threads upon closer inspection.16
Even phenomena fundamental to special relativity, such as time dilation, would manifest discretely at these scales. While the underlying formula for time dilation might remain the same, the calculation of dilated time would yield an integer multiple of the chronon.7 This implies that time dilations would change at "abrupt, albeit very small, speed steps".7
2.4 Further Implications for Reality and Measurement
If time is truly discrete, then the "present moment" is not an infinitely divisible point, but rather a fundamental, irreducible unit—a chronon.7 This provides a physical, rather than purely philosophical, grounding for the idea of a distinct "now." This perspective contrasts sharply with the classical view of time as a continuous, infinitely flowing medium, suggesting that at the most fundamental level, time "ticks" in discrete steps, much like a cosmic clock.17
The implications of discrete spacetime are not solely theoretical; they could lead to observable consequences. The discrete nature of time dilation, for instance, suggests that for extremely accurate clocks, time dilations might exhibit "abrupt, albeit very small, speed steps".7 This offers a potential, though immensely challenging, experimental avenue to test the fundamental discreteness of spacetime, thereby moving this profound concept from the realm of pure speculation into that of empirical science.
Furthermore, if spacetime is granular, the classical notion of continuous "motion" or "translation" (often described by infinitesimal spatial diffeomorphisms) fundamentally breaks down.16 Instead, motion at the Planck scale would be understood as a series of discrete "jumps" between the nodes within the spin network.15 This means that at the most fundamental level, the very concept of "moving from point A to point B" in a continuous trajectory loses its meaning. It is replaced by a more fundamental, combinatorial process, challenging our intuitive understanding of movement and the continuity of space.
3. The Nature of Time: "Only Now" and the "Infinite Present"
This section pivots to the philosophical implications of the statements "In reality there is only now. Now is infinite." It explores various theories of time and how they interact with the scientific understanding of discrete spacetime.
3.1 Philosophical Theories of Time: Presentism vs. Eternalism
The assertion "In reality there is only now" strongly aligns with Presentism, a metaphysical theory that posits that only the present moment is real, while the past and future do not exist.19 Proponents of presentism argue that existence is confined to the present, and that the present does not travel through time but merely changes.21 Critics of presentism often raise questions about how time can progress if only the present exists, and how phenomena like memory (of a non-existent past) and anticipation (of a non-existent future) can be accounted for within this framework.19
In contrast, Eternalism, also known as the Block Universe theory, holds that all points in time—past, present, and future—are equally real.21 This model depicts the entire history of the universe as a static, timeless block, much like a movie DVD where the beginning, middle, and end are already set.23 From this perspective, the distinction between past, present, and future is often considered a "stubbornly persistent illusion".23 A variation, the
Growing Block Universe, suggests that the past and present exist, but the future does not yet exist, with new moments continually being added to the block as time progresses.22 This dynamic view attempts to reconcile the reality of the past with the open-ended nature of the future.
3.2 Relativity's Challenge to a Universal "Now"
Many philosophers argue that the theories of special and general relativity are incompatible with presentism, leaning instead towards eternalism.21 A cornerstone of relativity is the relativity of simultaneity, which implies that there is no universal "now".23 What constitutes the "present" for one observer may be in the past or future for another, depending on their relative motion. Albert Einstein himself was an eternalist, viewing the distinction between past, present, and future as a persistent illusion.23 The mathematical elegance of spacetime diagrams in relativity often suggests a four-dimensional block where all events are equally real and interconnected. This perspective challenges the common human intuition of a unique, flowing present moment.
3.3 The "Problem of Time" in Quantum Gravity
The reconciliation of time as described in general relativity with its treatment in quantum mechanics leads to what is known as the "problem of time" in quantum gravity.16 General relativity treats time as a dynamic variable, interwoven with space to form spacetime, which can be warped by mass and energy. In contrast, standard quantum mechanics typically assumes a fixed, external background time against which quantum events unfold.
This fundamental incompatibility poses a significant challenge for theories attempting to unify these two pillars of modern physics. Some theories of quantum gravity, such as Julian Barbour's approach, even propose that reality is fundamentally timeless, suggesting that time is an emergent property or an illusion at a deeper level of reality.21 Conversely, other physicists, like Lee Smolin, argue that time is physically fundamental and that the very laws of physics might evolve over time.21 Within Loop Quantum Gravity, the Hamiltonian constraint, which is related to dynamics and time evolution, remains a subtle and unresolved issue, representing a key hurdle in fully defining the theory's dynamics.16 The struggle to define time in a quantum gravitational context underscores the profound philosophical and physical questions surrounding its true nature.
3.4 The Concept of "Infinite Now"
The philosophical concept of infinity distinguishes between "potential infinity" and "actual infinity".25 Potential infinity refers to a never-ending process, unbounded but finite at any given specific time, such as the endless possibility of bisecting a magnitude.25 Actual infinity, conversely, refers to an infinity that exists wholly at one time, timeless and complete, like the entire set of integers.26
When considering the phrase "Now is infinite," several interpretations emerge. It could imply a potentially infinite "now," an ever-unfolding, unbounded present moment that continually generates new reality. This aligns conceptually with the "growing block universe" theory, where new slices of existence are perpetually added to the sum total of reality.22 Alternatively, "Now is infinite" could refer to an actually infinite "now," a timeless, complete present that encompasses all of existence, where past and future are merely aspects of this eternal present. This interpretation resonates more strongly with eternalism 21 and certain spiritual perspectives where "time doesn't exist and everything is connected and happening all at once".27 In this view, there is no "before" or "after," only one vast, interconnected "now".27
3.5 Broader Implications: Subjectivity, Apparent Reality, and the Nature of Existence
The tension between our lived experience of a flowing "now" (presentism) and the implications of modern physics (eternalism, the relativity of simultaneity) creates a profound philosophical dilemma. The initial query highlights this tension. Our perception of a unique, moving "now" might be a deeply ingrained human experience, a "stubbornly persistent illusion" as Einstein suggested 23, rather than an objective feature of spacetime. However, this does not diminish its subjective reality for conscious beings. The challenge for philosophy is to reconcile this subjective experience with objective physical theories.
If spacetime is truly discrete at the Planck scale, then the "now" is not an infinitely thin slice but a fundamental, irreducible unit, a chronon.7 This could provide a physical basis for the "present moment" that is more concrete than in continuous spacetime models. This offers a potential reconciliation: while time might appear continuous at macroscopic scales, and relativity might suggest eternalism, the underlying discrete structure could mean that each "tick" of the cosmic clock is a singular, fundamental "now" that is the only truly "real" moment.
The phrase "Now is infinite" can be interpreted not as an endlessly expanding present, but as a state of timeless completeness, where all moments coexist. This aligns with the concept of actual infinity 26 and some interpretations of the block universe.23 This view challenges our linear perception of time, suggesting that from a higher, perhaps non-physical, perspective, all events—past, present, and future—are simultaneously accessible or "real" within an eternal, infinite present. This resonates with theological views where a divine entity perceives a block universe, encompassing all of creation at once.21
4. The Unity of Existence: "All is One"
This section explores the profound philosophical and spiritual assertion "All is One," drawing connections to monistic philosophies, concepts of interconnectedness in quantum mechanics, and unity consciousness in spiritual traditions.
4.1 Philosophical Monism: The Ultimate Oneness
Monism is a broad philosophical term encompassing doctrines that assert there is ultimately only one thing, or only one kind of thing, in existence.28 This stands in contrast to dualism, which posits two distinct kinds of things (e.g., mind and matter), or pluralism, which suggests many independent entities.29 Monism can manifest in various forms:
idealist monism holds that only minds or spirits fundamentally exist; material monism asserts that everything is ultimately material; and neutral monism proposes a single basic substance that is neither mental nor physical.29 Historically, ancient philosophers like Parmenides argued for a changeless, undifferentiated reality where the appearance of plurality is an illusion.29 Plotinus, in later antiquity, influentially declared that everything emanated from "the One," an ultimate, undifferentiated entity.29 These philosophical traditions lay the groundwork for understanding the deep-seated human inclination towards a unified view of reality.
4.2 Advaita Vedanta: The Non-Dual Reality
A profound expression of monistic thought is found in Advaita Vedanta, a Sanskrit philosophy whose name literally means "non-dual" (a-dvaita).30 This school of thought asserts that all reality and everything experienced in the world has its ultimate root in Brahman, an unchanging intelligent Consciousness.30 Rather than simply stating "oneness," Advaita Vedanta often prefers the phrase "not two" to emphasize that ultimate reality is a perfect whole without limits or boundaries.30 From this perspective, the apparent differences we perceive—between Self and Other, or between Humanity and the Absolute—do not affect the absolute Reality.30 This philosophy is intimately connected with practices such as meditation, which are designed to help individuals discover this non-dual reality within their own being.30 Advaita Vedanta offers a rationally consistent worldview that explains how perceived differences arise in our experienced world without negating the underlying absolute unity.
4.3 Interconnectedness in Quantum Mechanics
The field of quantum mechanics offers intriguing parallels to the concept of "All is One" through its descriptions of fundamental reality. A key concept is the universal wave function, which posits that the entire universe can, in principle, be described by a single, all-encompassing wave function.32 This perspective suggests that all particles and their interactions are interconnected within a unified quantum state, challenging traditional interpretations that view particles as entirely separate entities.32
A striking phenomenon illustrating this is quantum entanglement. This demonstrates that particles that have interacted remain connected, such that the state of one instantaneously influences the state of another, regardless of the distance separating them—a phenomenon famously dubbed "spooky action at a distance" by Einstein.32 This provides a scientific basis for a deep, non-local interconnectedness, where the universe is not merely a collection of independent parts.
Building on these ideas, physicist David Bohm proposed the theory of the Implicate Order. Bohm suggested that beyond the visible, tangible world lies a deeper, "implicate order" of "undivided wholeness".34 In this theory, everything is connected, and in principle, any individual element could reveal detailed information about every other element in the universe.34 Bohm's concept of the "holomovement" describes this "unbroken wholeness of the totality of existence as an undivided flowing movement without borders," endlessly enfolding and unfolding into infinite dimensionality.34 This theory offers a powerful scientific-philosophical framework for understanding "All is One" by positing a hidden, unified reality from which our perceived fragmented reality emerges.
4.4 Unity Consciousness in Spiritual Traditions
Many spiritual traditions articulate a concept known as "oneness spirituality" or "unity consciousness." At its core, this is the recognition of an intimate connection to universal intelligence, a higher power, or ultimate truths.27 It manifests as a profound sense of oneness, compassion, love, and respect for all beings and nature, where perceived boundaries between oneself and everything else dissolve.27
This state of unity consciousness is often cultivated through dedicated practices such as meditation and mindfulness, which help individuals to quiet the mind and transcend the sense of separation.27 Wisdom traditions globally emphasize the cultivation of vital life energy (known by various names such as qi or prana) and virtues as pathways to achieve this elevated state of awareness.35 In such a state, harming others can be experienced as harming oneself, and mutual joy and co-suffering become foundational for global solidarity.35 This experiential dimension of interconnectedness complements the theoretical descriptions provided by physics and philosophy.
4.5 Broader Implications: Convergence, Emergence, and the Limits of Scientific Inquiry
While distinct in methodology, the conceptual frameworks emerging from advanced physics, such as quantum entanglement and Bohm's implicate order, share striking parallels with ancient philosophical and spiritual concepts of unity and interconnectedness. This is not a direct scientific validation of spiritual claims but rather a fascinating convergence of ideas across different domains of human inquiry. The "spooky action at a distance" of entanglement 33 and Bohm's assertion that "the whole universe is enfolded in everything" 36 provide a scientific language for describing a non-fragmented reality. These descriptions echo the "not two" principle of Advaita Vedanta 30 and the "web of life" in indigenous traditions 33, suggesting that fundamental reality might be more unified than our everyday experience suggests.
The concept of "All is One" challenges a purely reductionist scientific paradigm, which typically seeks to understand complex systems by breaking them down into their smallest components. Instead, it suggests that fundamental properties might only be understood in the context of the whole, or that the whole is primary to its parts. Bohm's Implicate Order 34 is a prime example of a scientific theory that embraces holism, where the "unbroken wholeness of the totality of existence" is considered fundamental. This implies that some aspects of reality, particularly at the quantum level, cannot be fully grasped by analyzing isolated parts but necessitate a holistic perspective.
It is crucial to distinguish between scientific models and direct spiritual experience. While science can describe the mechanisms of interconnectedness (e.g., entanglement), the experience of "unity consciousness" is often described as a subjective, experiential state.27 This distinction is important when considering phenomena sometimes grouped under "quantum mysticism," which is criticized for misusing quantum physics to support pseudoscientific or mystical claims.37 While some physicists are exploring the relationship between quantum phenomena and consciousness, it is imperative to differentiate rigorous scientific inquiry from uncritical appropriation.39 The "All is One" statement, while resonating with scientific findings, also points to a realm of experience and meaning that extends beyond empirical measurement, inviting contemplation that transcends the purely empirical.
Conclusion: Synthesizing Scientific and Metaphysical Understandings
This report has navigated the intricate landscape where the cutting edge of physics meets profound philosophical and spiritual inquiry. The analysis began by rigorously evaluating the intriguing numerical assertion regarding the ratios between the Planck scale, a proton, and the Solar System. While direct numerical equality was not found, the very act of seeking such "cosmic coincidences" underscores an enduring human quest for meaning within the universe's vast scales. This led to a discussion of the Dirac Large Numbers Hypothesis and the anthropic principle, which suggest that the universe's fundamental constants may be remarkably "fine-tuned" for the emergence of life.
The exploration then delved into the scientific frontier of discrete spacetime. Theories like Loop Quantum Gravity provide a compelling theoretical framework for the idea of "frames in a movie," positing a granular, atomic structure to space and time at the Planck scale. This suggests that our perception of continuous motion is an emergent phenomenon, a macroscopic appearance arising from a fundamentally discrete reality. The persistent "problem of time" in quantum gravity further highlights the deep philosophical challenges in reconciling our lived experience of a flowing present with scientific models that often lean towards a timeless, eternal block universe.
Finally, the report examined the profound assertion "All is One." This concept finds echoes in philosophical monism, the non-dual teachings of Advaita Vedanta, and the scientifically observed interconnectedness of quantum phenomena, particularly quantum entanglement and David Bohm's theory of the Implicate Order. These scientific ideas, while distinct from spiritual beliefs, offer intriguing parallels to the notion of an underlying, undivided wholeness of existence. Unity consciousness, as cultivated in spiritual traditions, represents an experiential dimension of this interconnectedness, providing a subjective pathway to understanding this profound unity.
In synthesizing these diverse perspectives, the inherent limitations of current scientific models in fully addressing ultimate questions about existence, consciousness, and the nature of reality become apparent. While science provides increasingly precise descriptions of the universe's mechanisms, philosophy and spirituality continue to explore its meaning and humanity's place within it. The initial query serves as a powerful reminder that the most profound understandings often emerge at the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains, inviting contemplation of a reality that is both scientifically intricate and profoundly unified. The scientific pursuit of a "theory of everything" and the spiritual pursuit of "unity consciousness" may ultimately represent two distinct yet converging paths towards a deeper understanding of the "infinite now" in which "All is One."
Works cited
Planck units - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
What is Planck Time? - Universe Today, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.universetoday.com/79418/planck-time/
en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units#:~:text=In%20particle%20physics%20and%20physical,a%20numerical%20value%20of%201.
Planck units - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
Planck Length - (College Physics I – Introduction) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed June 27, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-college-physics/planck-length
Planck Length | Encyclopedia MDPI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/35202
DISCRETE SPACETIME QUANTUM FIELD THEORY - Computer ..., accessed June 27, 2025, https://cs.du.edu/~mathfiles/preprints/nsm-math-preprint-1704.pdf
Chronology of the universe - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton#:~:text=The%20proton%20charge%20radius%20is,in%20any%20matter%20they%20traverse.
Proton - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
Solar System Scale - CSUN, accessed June 27, 2025, http://www.csun.edu/science/geoscience/astronomy/resources/solar_system_scale.htm
en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis#:~:text=Known%20as%20the%20anthropic%20coincidence,life%20would%20not%20arise%20otherwise.
Dirac large numbers hypothesis - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis
www.numberanalytics.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/quantum-gravity-and-spacetime#:~:text=Theories%20of%20Quantum%20Gravity&text=It%20postulates%20that%20spacetime%20is,the%20use%20of%20loop%20variables.
Can someone please give the simplest (as possible) explanation of Loop Quantum Gravity?, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1lbr4t/can_someone_please_give_the_simplest_as_possible/
Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity
Spacetime Discreteness: Shedding Light on Two of the Simplest Observations in Physics, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=85341
String theory - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
Philosophical presentism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/philosophical-presentism
Presentism and Eternalism - PhilArchive, accessed June 27, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/INGPAE
Eternalism (philosophy of time) - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism_(philosophy_of_time)
Growing block universe - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_block_universe
The block universe is interesting, but not comforting - SelfAwarePatterns, accessed June 27, 2025, https://selfawarepatterns.com/2020/10/25/the-block-universe-is-interesting-but-not-comforting/
Time | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed June 27, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/time/
Infinity (philosophy) - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity_(philosophy)
The Infinite | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed June 27, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/infinite/
Oneness Spirituality: Understanding It And How To Get There, accessed June 27, 2025, https://jeannenangle.com/oneness-spirituality-understanding-and-how-to-get-there
www.rep.routledge.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/monism/v-1#:~:text=9780415249126%2DN034%2D1-,Article%20Summary,equally%20broad%20term%20'pluralism'.
Monism - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/monism/v-1
Advaita Vedanta - Shanti Sadan, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.shantisadan.org/advaita-vedanta/
Advaita Vedanta - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Quantum Interconnectedness: Exploring the Universal Wave Function's Influence on Relationships, Lunar Phases, and Meat Curing - Earthworm Express, accessed June 27, 2025, https://earthwormexpress.com/about-eben/k-b/sacred-salt-and-the-northern-gods/holisticus-index-page/the-greatest-of-these/quantum-interconnectedness-exploring-the-universal-wave-functions-influence-on-relationships-lunar-phases-and-meat-curing/
Exploring the Interconnectedness of All Things | by Diego Luján | Medium, accessed June 27, 2025, https://diego-lujan.medium.com/exploring-the-interconnectedness-of-all-things-798d4fb00c40
David Bohm, Implicate Order and Holomovement - Science and Nonduality (SAND), accessed June 27, 2025, https://scienceandnonduality.com/article/david-bohm-implicate-order-and-holomovement/
Jing Lin - Cultivating Unity Consciousness - Great Transition Initiative, accessed June 27, 2025, https://greattransition.org/gti-forum/global-solidarity-lin
Quote by David Bohm: “The essential feature in quantum interconnected...” - Goodreads, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7978383-the-essential-feature-in-quantum-interconnectedness-is-that-the-whole
Quantum mysticism - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mysticism
Quantum Physics Mysticism & New Age Religion - Schrodinger's Cat?, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/views/qm-cr.htm
Is Consciousness Research The Next Big Quantum Use Case?, accessed June 27, 2025, https://thequantuminsider.com/2025/01/11/is-consciousness-research-the-next-big-quantum-use-case/
Quantum Gravity Consciousness Could Cause Brain Controlled Atemporal Evolution of Space-Time - Qeios, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.qeios.com/read/G7A24R
Comments
Post a Comment